Loading…
Structurabeta
The Fund Architecture Platform
Open the Terms of Service below and scroll to the end to enable the acknowledgment above.
© 2026 AnchorPoint Labs, Inc.

Structurabeta

Cost Assumptions

Per-entity formation & annual costs ($ thousands)

Base-level estimates ($ thousands), drawn from publicly available information and AmLaw 100 assumptions; some figures may be imprecise. Drag any slider to your own numbers. These assumptions are yours as the user, not a property of any one structure: the same card applies to every structure you open, is saved in this browser, and travels with each saved file, so a reopened structure reproduces its analysis under the assumptions saved with it.

These costs are more material to small funds than large ones, and the recommendation already discounts cost as fund size rises. Administration and audit are billed by the fund’s administrator and auditor in addition to legal fund-formation costs, so they are independent of the legal rate above; administration in particular is typically priced on AUM, and these defaults assume a mid-size fund and scale with fund size.

This model estimates the expected legal and operating effort of a given fund architecture so that structural alternatives can be compared on a consistent basis; it does not predict any particular firm’s invoice or any provider’s quote. The formation figures reflect initial document preparation before investor negotiation; the Negotiation & Closing drivers below estimate the incremental work that typically arises during fundraising (side letters, MFN, anchor negotiations), shown as its own section in the Est. Structural Costs window and the Decision Table cost rows.

Modeling Conventions & Assumptions

The full statement of what the economic model prices and the conventions it applies

Build a Structure

Three ways to start: answer a few questions, describe the structure, or upload a chart to capture.

Structura Assistant ✦ AI-powered

Ask about your structure, or try a what-if change · grounded in Structura’s design rules
Ask about this structure
Answered using the design-rule findings for what’s on your canvas. General information to assist you, not legal or tax advice.
What if… (try a change)+
These optional AI features send your question, description or structure to our model provider only to fulfill your request; the data is not used to train the model. Avoid entering client-identifying information.

Solve / Iterate · Simulate & Decide

Check the current structure’s issues, then explore ranked alternatives and fixes

Decision Table

Every open structure compared on investors, assets, cost, tax and regulatory findings

Adviser Home-State Comparison

All 51 jurisdictions: exemption availability, filing burden and state tax posture for basing the firm

Template Library

Reference structures, open any in a new window

Send Feedback

Comments on the current structure

Your comments go to Structura product review, never into any dataset. Nothing about your structure is sent automatically, only the text you type below and the structure’s name. Your sign-in email is attached so we know it is from you. Please don’t include client or investor names.

Leave blank to use your sign-in email. Feedback is not anonymous.

Billing & Plan

Your Structura access

Loading…

Draft ready. We strongly recommend going through each entity and entering as much information as possible so the simulator can produce the optimal structure. Default settings may otherwise create issues, including structural red flags. For example, a 3(c)(1) fund advised by an RIA is treated as charging carried interest by default, so its investors must be qualified clients; only if the fund charges no carry could it instead admit merely accredited investors. Once you’re ready, press Solve / Iterate to check the structure and run simulations.
Start a private fund structure. Click Build Structure to generate a starting structure, or drag entities from the palette to build your own. If you build your own, a complete structure needs four elements: an investor, a pooling vehicle, an asset, and a general partner or investment manager.
Layers
Shape = Tax Classification
Triangle = Partnership (LP / ELP)
Rectangle = Corporation
Rect + Triangle = Check-the-Box Partnership
Dashed = Disregarded Entity (DRE)
Rounded = Investor
Hexagon = Asset / Holding
Slate Fill = Sponsor (GP / Manager)
Amber Fill = Corporate Tax Treatment (Blocker / REIT / TRS / Corp-Electing Feeder)
Green ⚡ = Subscription / Capital-Call Facility
Red ⚡ = Acquisition Financing (§514 debt-financed UBTI)
Orange ⚡ = Leveraged Blocker (shareholder debt; §163(j)/§267A, not §514)
Red Edge = Flagged Exposure Path
Navy Dash-Dot = Debt / Note (lender → borrower)

Econ Model — Copy

Read-only copy; the live model stays in the △ Econ Model tab

Economic Model

Outcome simulation, scenarios & tax leakage over the drawn structure

Reports

Fund Design Report & Document Checklist for this window
$

Est. Structural Costs

The incremental cost of the drawn architecture; its fund-borne totals are the Econ Model’s org & opex defaults

Decision Table

Every open structure compared on investors, assets, cost, tax and regulatory findings